{
  "manualOnly": true,
  "providerRequests": 0,
  "locale": "en",
  "group": "b2b-link-building",
  "title": "B2B link building: create a resource buyers can actually reference",
  "notice": "This is a manual planning aid, not a live audit, supplier catalog or ranking prediction. Examples are fictional. Nothing is fetched or submitted; downloaded files stay on your device.",
  "diagram": {
    "title": "From buyer task to an editorial decision",
    "caption": "Fictional planning relationships, not a guaranteed acquisition funnel.",
    "relationLabel": "Relationships",
    "nodes": [
      {
        "id": "buyer",
        "title": "Buyer question",
        "body": "What information is missing before a quotation can be compared?"
      },
      {
        "id": "resource",
        "title": "Reviewed resource",
        "body": "Approved evidence, explicit unknowns and a maintained document version."
      },
      {
        "id": "editor",
        "title": "Independent editorial decision",
        "body": "An author decides whether the resource helps their readers."
      }
    ],
    "relations": [
      {
        "id": "informs",
        "from": "buyer",
        "to": "resource",
        "label": "defines the information needed in"
      },
      {
        "id": "consideration",
        "from": "resource",
        "to": "editor",
        "label": "can be considered in"
      }
    ]
  },
  "columns": [
    "Buyer question",
    "Proposed reference asset",
    "Evidence required",
    "Editorial acceptance check"
  ],
  "rows": [
    {
      "id": "comparison",
      "title": "Can we compare quotations consistently?",
      "values": [
        "A checklist of required fields and explicit exclusions.",
        "Approved terminology and a reviewer who understands the buying process.",
        "Does the reader see what is missing without invented performance values?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "requirements",
      "title": "Which operating constraints need discussion?",
      "values": [
        "A requirements-gathering sheet with unanswered fields clearly marked.",
        "Actual product documentation and review by the responsible technical team.",
        "No assumed compatibility, safety limit or engineering conclusion."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "service",
      "title": "What service information is available?",
      "values": [
        "A dated explanation of where support and service details can be checked.",
        "Current, approved service information and contact responsibility.",
        "Availability and promises are stated only where verified."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "revision",
      "title": "Which document version applies?",
      "values": [
        "A source register linking each claim to its document revision.",
        "Document identifier, revision date and accountable owner.",
        "Readers can trace facts and recognize superseded material."
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "handoff",
      "title": "What happens after the brief?",
      "values": [
        "A clear handoff for questions that require a supplier review.",
        "An agreed contact process and the limits of the public resource.",
        "The resource helps prepare a conversation; it does not fabricate a quote or lead."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "example": "Our fictional packaging-equipment supplier prepares a quotation-evidence brief. It helps buyers gather operating requirements, identify documents needed for comparison, locate service information and record the revision of each supplied specification. The matrix below is a content plan, not engineering advice: it supplies no machine limits, compatibility decisions, certification claims or invented tests. A qualified reviewer must verify any real technical facts before publication.",
  "decision": "Build the resource from traceable material: approved product documents, dated service information, defined exclusions and an accountable reviewer. Explain what the reader can conclude and what still requires a supplier conversation. Avoid publishing confidential customer details or filling unknown specification fields with guesses. The diagram shows how a buyer question informs a reviewed resource, which an independent editor may decide to reference; it does not show a guaranteed link funnel.",
  "checklist": [
    "Choose one concrete buyer task.",
    "Use approved evidence and a named review responsibility.",
    "Explain the relevant editorial context without promising a link.",
    "Maintain the resource and distinguish references from business outcomes."
  ],
  "reviewRecord": "Identify editorial contexts where the brief solves a reader problem, such as a procurement training article explaining how to compare quotations. Read the actual page and explain the specific useful section without demanding a backlink. Any advertisement or paid placement needs an appropriately qualified link relationship. Record outreach as proposed contact and record a published reference only after observing its source URL, destination and context. This page sends no messages and provides no verified publisher inventory."
}