{
  "manualOnly": true,
  "providerRequests": 0,
  "locale": "en",
  "group": "skyscraper-link-building",
  "title": "Skyscraper link building: improve the resource, not just its length",
  "notice": "This is a manual planning aid, not a live audit, supplier catalog or ranking prediction. Examples are fictional. Nothing is fetched or submitted; downloaded files stay on your device.",
  "columns": [
    "Review area",
    "Before: weak fictional resource",
    "After: original improvement brief",
    "Acceptance check"
  ],
  "rows": [
    {
      "id": "reader-task",
      "title": "Reader task",
      "values": [
        "A long adapter list gives names but no selection criteria.",
        "Define the reader’s setup and the information needed to compare options.",
        "Can a reader identify what information is still needed before choosing?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "evidence",
      "title": "Evidence",
      "values": [
        "Specifications are repeated without dates or a traceable source.",
        "Record dated primary specifications, uncertainty and any actual test method separately.",
        "Can each important factual statement be checked without invented experience?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "presentation",
      "title": "Presentation",
      "values": [
        "Repeated prose hides limitations and exceptions.",
        "Use an original comparison layout, exclusions and a short verification checklist.",
        "Can the reader find the relevant limitation without reading unrelated filler?"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "outreach",
      "title": "Outreach fit",
      "values": [
        "Every site linking to a competing page receives the same request.",
        "Review the source context and describe the specific new value for its readers.",
        "Is the proposed reference relevant, optional and accurately described?"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "example": "Consider a fictional adapter reference that lists names without helping a reader compare requirements. The revised brief adds an original comparison structure, explicit exclusions, dated specification sources and a clear route to unresolved questions. It does not claim real product compatibility or tests that were never conducted.",
  "decision": "Choose improvements by the task: can the reader find the right information, understand the limits and check the basis? A concise table may serve better than another thousand words. If a claim needs testing, either perform and document it or narrow the content to the evidence actually available.",
  "checklist": [
    "Define a distinct unresolved reader task.",
    "Create original evidence or a useful way to verify it.",
    "Test whether the revised resource answers the task.",
    "Contact relevant editors honestly without promising acceptance."
  ],
  "reviewRecord": "Before outreach, check the resource as a new reader and review each candidate source’s context. Explain the specific useful addition and leave the editorial decision to the owner. Do not send a generic demand for a link or treat a publisher’s silence as consent. Record proposed contacts separately from links observed live."
}